MadridTeacher.com  
Profesores - Madrid Employment - Madrid Jobs in Spain Academias de Inglés Links Profesores Corredor de Henares
 

ESL Editor / Writer

Complementary Professions:

If you’re a good materials producer, there are quite a few academies out there that will try to get you to contribute your course programs and/or materials to them for free, citing “team spirit,” etc. Don’t tell the shameless s@bs to take a hike or laugh in their faces, but don’t give up those materials without a fight either.

 
Teachers Required
Profesores - Madrid
Profesores Madrid
Página Principal
Profesores de Inglés
Madrid Centro pag 2
Profesores norte
Profesores noroeste
Profesores sur
Profesores suroeste
Profesores sureste
Corredor del Henares
Profesores España
Online Teachers
Traducciones
English Teachers - Madrid
English Teachers Madrid - map
Employment Madrid
Jobs in Spain
English Teaching in Madrid - Articles
Best of Madrid
Madrid Photos
English Academies in Madrid
Estudiar Inglés
Estudiar Inglés
Vocabulario - inglés
Gramática - inglés

David Overton

TEFL Diary

Latest Blog Post:
Using Videos in Class
 Scroll down
 
 


Google Plus Page

RSS for Jobs  RSS para alumnos

It takes lots of hours and creative effort to produce these things and the second you give them up for nothing in exchange, you lose just about every bit of advantage that you had over your “competitors” as a professional English teacher.

You might instead drop by with some of your best materials to any of the ESL publishers with offices in Madrid and have a little chat about being either a writer or editor for them. You never know, you might get lucky.

The publishing industry here in Madrid is just like any other: a meat-market paying “competitive” rates. “Competitive” around here means lower than average (especially for you the tourist-teacher or “immigrant”) and don’t expect publishers to be any different. That’s just the way it is. Back home in England, publishers like CUP (Cambridge University Press) and Richmond might be a pretty formal bunch, but my general impression is that they just go with the mainstream work-ethic and culture here, which isn’t quite so formal and probably a bit more opportunistic.


Company Requires English Teachers



In any case, though it’s not without problems, I think working for a publisher is probably better economically-speaking than working for 95% of academies in the short and mid-term, but I think you can do a lot better in the long-term if you’re already working for yourself as a freelance like I am. However, if you’re ambitious and you’re after some sort of big-league professional advancement (i.e. University professor, big-shot author, etc.), working for a publisher would be the thing to do.

So, how to get in? I think the best way people have of getting their foot in the door is through good-old-fashioned networking. The only editors I know tell me that’s how they got in (i.e. via acquaintances), but you could be different. However, I think there’s probably a very good reason why knowing someone might be so important in order to get your foot in the door: “trust.”

Because, in my experience, they’ll push that “trust” for all it’s worth. For example, in order to consider you as a candidate for “editor” or “writer,” they might ask you to hand in a complete sample unit. (Now, go off and work on it for a couple of weeks or a month and take it back and hand it over just like that – for free.) That’s a bit too much for folks like me. But if you can stomach it, go for it! You might just get lucky.

Or, for example, you might get your foot in the door, but without a firm commitment. In my case, I was in a sort of endless process of “negotiations” or whatever with one publisher to be one of three or four editors on an ESL web-page they are currently working on for a foreign government. At first, I had an offer for 40 hours per week. Then, after a month or two, the offer fell to 30 hours or so, which, given my current circumstances as a freelance, was a much better offer as it would have complemented my other work better, I thought. (The head editor found an editor from a competing publisher for me to share the load with.) Finally, in my last meeting a month or so later the offer fell to 22 hours per week. (The head editor’s ex-boss went freelance and asked for a few hours on the project.)

Now, I actually started work on the project and edited half of the first unit and the head editor said it was excellent editing work, but given the nature of the fluctuating and deteriorating “phantom-offer” (i.e. there, but not really there – and deteriorating every time somebody “better” – for him - showed up), I insisted on getting some sort of contract or agreement in writing committing to a certain number of hours and pay, etc. before I would continue. I’m still waiting a month later.

Now, perhaps in your case you would have shut up and stayed on the job. This company is a good multi-national and I probably would have been able to maneuver my way into better work conditions and pay in future projects, etc. However, in this case the editor offered me less (I recall somewhere around 2,000 for 40 hours work per week) than what I’m earning now without a firm commitment as to a certain number of hours and, given his behavioral history regarding his standing “network” (i.e. his old pals), I just couldn’t start cancelling any of my current clients. It really is a question of “trust.” (And the more work that you put into getting a major client, the more trust that you need.)

On the other hand, I’m sure I can’t get rich like just a very few of these big-time EFL authors are doing. I recall one author at a TEFL convention in Madrid just letting it drop that his last text-book had sold 15 million copies just in its first test-run in China. I wonder what his royalties were.

However, I got the distinct impression that the man really knew what he was talking about in his session. He was both knowledgeable and persuasive as many of the lead-authors on these text-book series are: a real show-man. That’s what you have to be if you want do this kind of work. And, judging from my own short-lived experience as an editor for just one publisher, I think you also have to dedicate a fair-share of your time to networking and schmoozing (not necessarily in that order).

In my own case, I like creating, consider myself a writer and I have a few strong points, but I don’t think I'm anywhere as strong all-around as some of the hotshots in EFL writing. (i.e. Doctorate, DELTA, years of experience writing course-book materials, super-self-confident public speakers, etc. etc.) Also, I don't think I’d want to be a course-book writer for a publisher because if the team work I experienced in my publisher is the type of "team-work" that I'd have to put up with (remember: I was already having big problems getting the agreement even though I said it just about every way I could), I can see that I'd have had a lot more problems in the future.

And, by the way, I've been running my own show for some time and I have developed my own ideas on team work, which don't include my not noticing or reacting to what my team workers say, important or not.

Also, I just wouldn’t want to be on a commission-basis with any of these guys. No offense intended, but what’s to stop them from losing a zero when they declare what they’ve sold in order to pay you. (i.e. they sold 1,000 books instead of 10,000) Frankly, I’d rather either get the money up front working as an editor, etc. or control the whole distribution chain by producing, marketing and selling the book myself – as is possible nowadays through the internet. Even if it means I end up really selling just the 1,000 books.

In the end, what I really want to say is to not sell yourself cheap. Your price will depend on just how much you want and need the job, but in my experience desperation won't get you as high a salary as competence. (Competence in all things including your ability to negotiate a good one.)

The reason I always call English teaching in Madrid a meat market is because we're all lined up like so many slabs of meat and shoppers just walk through and take their pick depending on what they want, which might not coincide with what you want. It might not include your being the best or the freshest either, because you might be too expensive for them. (There are fish markets here, for example, that sell really cheap fish. You'll notice, however, that they often come minus the heads and fins as that's how you'd be able to tell that it's all just about to start really stinking.) That's just the way of it in teaching and it looks to me like it's just the way it is in editing and writing for publishers here. It's not always either rational or pretty, but none of us have much choice in the matter.

By the way, don't stop producing your materials. You might just get together with some other old pros like me at some point in the future for a materials swap and double your stuff in one go. You might already be using "Neville's" old materials, for example, as I've seen from at least two agencies. (They're legendary. His Sherlock Holmes information gap readings are simply excellent.) There are teachers out here who make all of their own stuff up themselves and couldn't care less about publishers. They don't need them one bit and maybe you won't either.






Teachers Required












Information about advertising on this site.


Condiciones de Uso RSS Feeds Site Map Política de Seguridad y Protección de Datos



Email Webmaster Steven Starry at: madridteacher@gmail.com with any questions, comments or suggestions.
© MadridTeacher.com, 1999-2012.